Some time ago I was trying to make sense of the notions or game A and game B. In a nut shell, it is a discourse in the sensemaking community that advocates the need to shift from old structures to a new modality of our collective being. Game A represents the default mode of society that led us to the existential risks of climate change, consumerism, warfare etc. Game B is an alternative proposition for a future which is non-rivalrous, decentralised and complexity-sensitive. It is an interesting proposition that challenges the way we think about ourselves not only from individual perspective but also as being part of a larger context. It emphasises our interconnectedness and collective entanglement with each other. For me, personally, thinking about my individual presence in relation with others in the world, it opened up a lot of doors for wider thinking, more connection and the ability to surrender to uncertainly. An important aspect of this way of thinking is to be able to look at any occurrence from multiple perspectives. While thinking about